It has been a busy week in the Holme Valley.
Spring seems to be finally declaring an interest, but it is still stubbornly
cold, and March isn’t giving up those leaden skies without a fight. One of Maisie’s indestructible daffodils is
in bud, a single splash of yellow amongst the dreary dun brown of the remains
of winter’s ravages. The green is getting greener, between the trees, but I
still don’t think we’ve reached that stage “bytuene Mersh and Averil, whan
spray beginneth to springe”.
Now that it’s been just about warm enough to have the cat
flap in Colin’s side door open all the time, Matilda has been growing used to
coming and going as she pleases, although she does still also go to the
conservatory door to be let in and out as well.
The optimum solution would be to have a cat flap cut into the
conservatory door, but at £289 (because it involves re-glazing the entire
panel) it’s a long way off, yet.
Actually, a dog-flap would be a better investment, since
Matilda's needs could be encompassed within such a structure anyway and it would save me
having to trundle over there and let the wolf-pack of Misty, Zak and Ellie out
into the garden to do their necessaries. As it is, they stream out across the
decking, barking their stupid heads off and tumbling all over each other down
the steps into the garden. Zak and Misty have been doing the usual route-march
over the moors from Dove Stones to Chew Valley Reservoir, but Ellie has been
excused, owing to only having little legs.
Deb herself is getting demob-happy, counting down the four
remaining days of teaching next week until Easter sets in. In case you doubt her current state of
demob-happiness, pause to consider that we were watching Inspector Montalbano
for about twenty minutes on Saturday night with one of us under the
misapprehension that we were watching Wallender. And it wasn’t me. The disparity only emerged when, noting the
prominent role of Luca Zingaretti, Debbie observed that, in this episode, Wallender
was taking a long time to put in an appearance. Some times I worry about that girl.
One of the many personal challenges I had to overcome this
week was the saga of the wheelchair wheel.
For some days, I have been concerned because it had seemed to me that I
must be losing strength in my arms, especially in my left arm - the evidence
being that the wheelchair was becoming harder and harder to propel, especially
on that side. Ruling out a sudden and dramatic weight gain (I have been more or
less stable at the “lard mountain” stage of physique since my discharge from
hospital in 2010 when I gradually put back on the weight I had lost in the exertion
of nearly dying) the only other option was deterioration in my arms. This was
very depressing, because ultimately, once I lose that, I am also looking at
losing the ability to transfer independently. So it has been a constant worry,
at the back of what passes for my mind these days, depressing me every time I
thought about it.
There is a school of thought that says you should always
look for the simple answer that’s right under your nose, before considering
anything more complicated. This became
evident to me on Wednesday night when I looked down at the little front “bogie”
wheel of the wheelchair on the left-hand side, and noticed that the large
heavy-duty screw that holds it in place was sticking out at a weird angle, and
the front wheel had collapsed to one side and was chafing on the housing that
holds it in place.
My joy at realising that the difficulty in propelling myself
wasn’t due to my encroaching decrepitude, but rather to the fact that the wheel
must have been gradually going out of true and rubbing for days, slowing me
down by “binding” on the housing, was tempered somewhat by the fact that unless
I did something pretty soon, the screw/axle would come out altogether, the
wheel would collapse, and the wheelchair would probably pitch me out on to the
floor. I gently edged over to the box
where I keep the Allen keys and reached down, picking up the pouch and shoving
it in my pocket.
Very slowly, I then edged myself round so I was facing in
the opposite direction. I didn’t have the option of doing it quickly, anyway,
as the wheel was jammed solid and it was like driving with the brakes on. Torn
between having to use force to get anywhere at all, and not wanting to
precipitate the very disaster I was trying to avoid, eventually I made it next
door, and I was able to “park” alongside the closed commode, and shuffle
sideways on my “banana board” off the wheelchair onto the aforesaid thunderbox.
Once I was out of the wheelchair, I tipped it on its back
and I could see immediately what the trouble was. The wheel is actually held in
place by two reciprocating screws, one from either side, that tighten somehow
into each other. So although I could push the offending article back in place
with my fingers and, using the Allen key that fitted, get it finger-tight,
there was no way of actually “nipping it up”. Then I remembered that my dad’s
old penknife had a saw attachment on it that ended in two “prongs”.
Fortunately, the end of the saw fitted in the other side of the double-ended
axle screw.
So it was, dear reader, that I became possibly the only
person in history to fix a wheelchair wheel with an Allen key and a penknife,
with perhaps a soupçon of my father’s engineering genes, while seated on a
commode. So far, the repair seems to have held, but I had better keep an eye on
it and/or get it checked out at my next wheelchair appointment. It’s a minor
escapade, but, having sorted it, it felt briefly as if I’d been that bloke who
climbed out onto the wing of a Wellington bomber
over Essen and
put out the burning engine with a fire-extinguisher.
So I was feeling pretty pleased with myself at having dodged
that particular bullet, and scored a small victory, especially after the
disaster on Monday, when the garage came to pick up the camper van. I’ve let
the story run ahead of itself, so I need to catch my breath and re-wind a bit
here so we’re all on the same page again. Debbie went out to the camper in the
driveway on Sunday evening intending to just go down the road to the garage and
put some diesel in it, preparatory to setting off to college on the Monday
morning.
She had come back inside, saying that she was having some
difficulty with the lock, and couldn’t
open the door, and also that one of the tyres looked a bit flat. I suggested
that she shouldn’t try and force it, and that I had better get the garage to
come and look at the lock, as they had done some work on it as part of the
vehicle’s recent visit to the garage for its MOT in February (the old lock was
a bit feeble and wobbly, and they’d fitted a replacement linkage inside the
door) because I didn’t want to pay again for work we’d already had done in
February, if it had gone again so soon.
The garage man came down on Monday teatime and, looking at
the vehicle in the daylight, he confirmed that it had been the subject of
vandalism while parked at our house. Specifically: three of the tyres had been
slashed and the other one deliberately punctured. There had been an attempt to
jemmy the driver’s door, and in addition superglue had been poured into the
driver’s door lock. Superglue had also been squirted into the lock on the
filler cap. The hoses to both front brakes had been cut, and both front brake
callipers pulled down away from the point where they connect to the brakes.
I didn’t want to leave it in situ for another night in case whoever it was decided to come
back and finish the job, so I agreed that they should tow it up to the garage
and they’d lock it up there for me for the night. In the meantime, I reported the damage to the
police, and they attended on Monday evening and took a statement. On Tuesday morning, before the garage opened
properly for business, West Yorkshire Police and scenes of crime officers
attended and went over the vehicle, confirming the damage and taking
photographs. I was given a crime number
and it’s now in the hands of the insurers. And there I draw a veil over the
sorry proceedings, which will no doubt rumble on with mountains of paperwork
for weeks to come, except to observe that if I ever get within an axe-swing of
the bastards who did it, they will be going home in an ambulance, with their
windpipe in their coat pocket. I don’t do forgiveness.
Of course, while I have been battling this overwhelming tide
of ordure from all sides, the outside world has taken the opportunity of my
temporary distraction to go completely insane.
It’s not been all bad news. David Cameron has announced that
he doesn’t want to serve a third term. This rather presumes on his part that he
will get a second term, bringing to mind the old joke about thieves breaking
into the Kremlin and stealing next year’s election results. You shouldn’t count
your chickens, Dave, me old pal, me old beauty. One in the hand is worth two in
Kate Bush. Or something. Given the
swingeing welfare cuts that the Blight Brigade are planning if they do manage
to get he chance to inflict five more years of austerity nuclear winter on us,
it’s rather a pity he has to have a second term, let alone a third. Maybe he
doesn’t, but I am not holding out any hopes.
Meanwhile, under local anaesthetic and with the reluctant
facial expression of a bulldog chewing a wasp, the Director-General of the BBC
announced that they were sacking Jeremy Clarkson. He didn’t actually add the words “reluctantly,
because we can’t think of any other way out of this mess, without seeming to
excuse his boorish behaviour, although God knows we’ve tried” but the subtext
came through good and strong. It was the most unconvincing statement of wanting
to do something since Tony Blair declared in favour of banning fox-hunting,
then abstained in the Commons vote.
Anyway, the end result was that the buffoon in question
received some sort of just desserts, for doing what would have earned you or I
instant dismissal for gross misconduct, had we lamped someone in our place of
work. Cue the endless procession of
dismal apologists popping up on the news saying things like “It’s just Jeremy,
that’s how he is…” If you .think they had a point, try substituting “Adolf” for
“Jeremy”. But these people live in a world where they believe everything has
been spoiled by woolly-minded, weak-kneed liberalism, where you can get away
with any form of bullying, violence, or hate speech by labelling it “banter” –
a world where the way to react to women is to treat ‘em mean and keep ‘em keen; a world where the fox enjoys it. Yes, how much better it must have been in
medieval times, before political correctness, when if a household employee
failed to provide hot food on demand, you could just behead him, and throw
another slave on the fire.
As if a million people signing a petition to reinstate
Clarkson was not sufficient evidence that the entire nation had gone bonkers,
we also had the rather grotesque spectacle of the re-burial of Richard III’s
bones in Leicester Cathedral, and the self-styled “Ricardians” in the
congregation at the corresponding service in York Minster throwing a hissy-fit
because the sermon mentioned the rival proceedings 150 miles away. I have had some dealings with the Richard III
Society in my previous job, trying to organise a prospectus leaflet being
mailed out in one of their newsletters, and I have to say that their entire
membership, insofar as I have interacted with it, gives a convincing impression
of being several stops past Barking, and well off the bus route.
A lot of egos could have been salved, and I daresay a lot of money saved as well, if,
instead of the elaborate ceremony, the TV people had just run the original film
of the archaeological dig, backwards, with a muted soundtrack of “Land of Hope
and Glory” underneath. He could have had
a nice corner of the car park, a little space all of his own, complete with
yellow chevrons and a symbol meaning “Reserved for Dead Monarchs Only”, where
ordinary members of the public could have placed floral tributes, teddy bears,
and semi-literate messages of condolence.
The dominant news of the week though, which it has been
impossible to ignore, is that it seems that the co-pilot of a German
Wings/Lufthansa flight from Barcelona to Dusseldorf, under the influence of
depression, locked the pilot out of the cockpit and then flew the plane
deliberately into a mountain in the French Alps, killing himself and everyone
else on board.
This is the sort of tragedy that shakes your faith, and no
mistake. Once again I find that I have no answer to the massive question it
poses, of why Big G, if he was there and on watch, allowed such a thing to happen. Saying it’s all part of God’s plan just
doesn’t cut it. Who would want to worship a being, an entity, that incorporated
such things in its plan? Although I
suppose if God is really an omnipotent eternal force that contains everything
that ever was is, and shall be, worshipping it is pretty futile anyway, since
the last thing it needs is our puny adulation.
So, once more, I am forced onto the back foot, and all I can say is “God
knows”. I guess that you could put up a case for saying that suffering is
necessary in some degree, because otherwise how would the human condition ever
recognise happiness, except by contrast. It reverts to one of those
quasi-philosophical “big” questions of the kind we used to sit up and argue
about late into the night at college, boosting the profits of Nescafé, before
we knew any better – which would you rather have, a full life or a happy one?
Though I reckon if you asked the relatives weeping in the airport lounge for
their loved ones, you might get a “Jeremy Clarkson” in reply, and deservedly
so.
Katie Hopkins, meanwhile, has vowed to leave the UK if
Labour are elected in May. So, folks, you heard it here first. My standing as
an independent candidate in the Colne
Valley is only ever going
to take votes away from the opponents of the Blight Brigade. So I won’t be
standing as an independent for the Bolshy Party at the election; instead, I
will be voting Labour, not because I believe in, or support in any way, Ed
Miliband, who has been a disaster zone as leader of the opposition since 2010,
but simply to get rid of the Blight Brigade and, now, as an added bonus, to get
rid of Katie bloody Hopkins! And I urge you all to do likewise. True, if it
works, Ed Miliband will be Prime Minister, so it’s not all good news, but maybe there’s a way we can work around that. And,
just pause to think again about the massive advantage: Katie Hopkins will be
gone! Gone! Ding, dong, etc.
Meanwhile, my comment
about UKIP last week seems to have provoked a response from one of my dearest, longest-standing
correspondents and readers of my blog: I wrote:
"is
there any UKIP candidate, anywhere, who isn’t either nutty as a
fruitcake, racist, bent, homophobic, or perm any three from four?"
And she asked:
Don't bent racist
nutty homophobic fruitcakes deserve a voice too? I thought that's what
democracy meant.
Well, yes, they do. But they should publish a manifesto that
says clearly that they are bent,
racist, nutty, homophobic fruitcakes, and stand on that platform, instead of
pretending to be a serious political party.
And so we came to today, as if through a maze of thickets,
arriving at Palm Sunday. I always have a
problem with Palm Sunday, the bitter-sweet juxtaposition of the entry of Jesus
in triumph into Jerusalem, and the inevitability of the downfall that was to
follow, with the final twist in the tale, for those who believe it, of his eventual
victory over death. It marks the beginning of one of the most significant weeks
in the Christian year, containing Maundy Thursday, Good Friday and Easter
Saturday.
Sometimes they strew
His way,
And His sweet praises sing;
Resounding all the day
Hosannas to their King:
Then “Crucify!”
is all their breath,
And for His death
they thirst and cry
And His sweet praises sing;
Resounding all the day
Hosannas to their King:
Then “Crucify!”
is all their breath,
And for His death
they thirst and cry
Jesus rode into Jerusalem
on a donkey, or a colt, depending on which version and/or translation. The colt
option is to do with “fulfilling ancient prophecy” – a catch-all explanation
used in Bible interpretation for anything strange, wacky or odd, in the same
way that archaeologists always attribute anything they can’t otherwise explain
to “ritual” usage. Commentators who favour the donkey option point to it as a
symbol of peace, whereas if Jesus had entered Jerusalem on a horse, that would have been
seen as martial and warlike. I like the
donkey option – there’s a pleasing symmetry with the donkey that carried Jesus
to Bethlehem in
his mother’s womb, which has also been noticed by U A Fanthorpe in her poem What
the Donkey Saw:
No room in the inn, of
course,
And not that much in the stable
What with the shepherds, Magi, Mary,
Joseph, the heavenly host –
Not to mention the baby
Using our manger as a cot.
You couldn’t have squeezed another cherub in
For love or money.
And not that much in the stable
What with the shepherds, Magi, Mary,
Joseph, the heavenly host –
Not to mention the baby
Using our manger as a cot.
You couldn’t have squeezed another cherub in
For love or money.
Still, in spite of the
overcrowding,
I did my best to make them feel wanted.
I could see the baby and I
Would be going places together.
I did my best to make them feel wanted.
I could see the baby and I
Would be going places together.
Palm Sunday is always a difficult concept for me to grasp.
Not so much the volatile behaviour of the crowd – anyone who has ever done
anything that exposed them to public gaze or approbation knows how quickly the
mood can change from “enthusiastic band of supporters” to “angry mob baying for
blood”. What I struggle with is the
necessity of it all. As I’ve written
many times before, the first time I ever learnt the Easter story, at primary
school, almost my first thought was “well, if Jesus is the all-powerful Son of
God, why doesn’t he just get down off that cross and smite the Romans into the
middle of next week?” I could just see him striding into Pilate’s chamber and
knocking him flying off his chair with a swift backhander, his bare Roman legs
flailing as he lands in a heap with his bowl of soapy water on his head.
Fifty-odd (coughcough) years later, I still struggle with
it. It’s all part of the same knotty problem that prevents me forgiving, I guess.
Jesus didn’t do revenge, and although he had the power to stop it happening, he
allowed himself to be sacrificed, acknowledging the need for suffering in the
world by weeping over Jerusalem as the city came in sight, an event known as
the “Flevit super illam”, referenced in the Gospel of Luke, 19:41.
So, for theological reasons I really don’t comprehend,
Jesus, who was both God and man simultaneously, chose a full life over a happy
one, and suffered under Pilate and was crucified, in the words of the Apostles’
Creed. This explanation requires the help of a member of the audience, the
necessary betrayer, in the form of Judas. If you allow this as the explanation,
this sort of stacks up, but it’s never really explained why Big G had to do it
this way, when with a single “shazam” it could all have been put right. Once
more, I find myself questioning God’s motivation and motives. If you believe
it, we’re back to “love unknown” again.
It seems to come down to the fact that the grit in your eye
is needed to ensure that you appreciate being able to see again when it’s gone.
That the pebble in the shoe which we call Death is a necessary companion on the
road of life, and that loss, and pain are necessary in order to allow us to be
happy and flourish by contrast.
Anyway, we have already reached Palm Sunday and the start of
Holy Week. A week which will end with me turning sixty. How did that ever
happen? Well, I can truly say that I’ve had a full life, not a happy one,
though I didn’t necessarily choose it – except by default, by making bad
decisions! Still, as Shakespeare said:
“If all the year were playing holidays, to sport would be as tedious as to
work.”
I am, however, going to attempt something by way of sport
this afternoon. Not in the sweaty jockstrap sense of the word, but, after the week I've had, in the sense
of doing something for myself for a change, just for a couple of hours. Some
painting, and some baking, and maybe a further perusal of the herb nursery’s
catalogue. If it ever gets warm and stops raining, there is much work to be done
outside, and even in the time it has taken me to type this, the daffodil that
was in bud in the first few paragraphs has opened fully, a single brave banner
waving in the wind and rain outside, summoning me into next week, and into the
battle.
Why he had to do it this way... I'll try to write something for you and either post it here or on your FB or somewhere you will see it. A big question but if you select your angle right it should be answerable kind of.
ReplyDeleteForgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us. Forgiveness is the only logical option. Firstly, holding on only hurts you. By drinking poison you're only going to kill yourself, not your enemy. Secondly not forgiving hinders the Father from forgiving us. That is a terrifying prospect, having to stand before a holy God without our sins having been forgiven. No, Steve, forgiveness is the only way. It's also feels good. It is also an act of the will, not an emotional state. So if you find it hard to reconcile yourself emotionally with having to forgive someone, it doesn't matter. You simply decide you want to forgive, you say out loud - that's important - "I forgive for ", and move on. I earnestly encourage you to consider it, my friend. Your eternal destination may depend on it.
ReplyDeleteThank you both for your comments, I am surrounded by paint pots but I will look forward to reading further
ReplyDeleteSee Mustardland for comments. They won't fit here.
ReplyDeleteWhy did Jesus have to go through it all the way he did? Why didn't the Father just do a Shazam?
ReplyDeleteWhat follows are rough notes, this isn't an argument, it's just thoughts on paper.
One of the reasons was that Jesus was saving us, and as such he had to go through everything the long way round because of the principle of Incarnation. Incarnation is summed up in the saying “the Word became flesh”. The sin of Adam and Eve happened in human lives, humanity was the stage for sin, and it was on that stage where the remedy for sin had to be played out. As I find myself constantly having to remind my Satanist friends, we are not angels, we are human beings. We are creatures of time; as God said, after Noah's Flood, there will always be seedtime and harvest, summer and winter, up until the End. The redemption of time has to happen within time.
The point of what Jesus did was that he recapitulated human life, he lived a holy life, so that the kinks in human nature could be ironed out where they exist, i.e., in a human life. It's all part of God coming down to where we're at. God becoming flesh and entering time was God making himself available to us. Remember God is holy – that word means “separated”. Without Jesus we'd have an Islam style God, way above us, far too high and lifted up for us to be able to reach. In Jesus God came to within human reach. And in order to be accessible to everyone, whoever they are, Jesus had to go through things himself, to bring him within reach, to us who are trapped in time and space.
Jesus is the Life. All of Adam and his life, had to be killed, on the Cross, it was all infected fatally with the poison of sin, and when we enter into salvation, our old Adamic life is killed on the Cross, and we receive the Life of Jesus in return. Jesus' Incarnation was him transforming divinity into divine humanity, like a transformer in electronics. It was reducing the voltage of divine life from a million volts to nine volts so that we can handle it. By going through everything the way he did, he made divinity something that we humans can participate in. Otherwise we'd just be vaporised by the electricity of God's glory. He was making God's Life, which is Glory and Power to the nth degree, into the lowlier colours, textures, sounds, shapes of a human life. By doing the things he did in the way he did them, it was as if he was disciplining humanity to receive God. You see our ability to receive Christ is also something that God had to make for us. By his actions Christ was acting for everyone, practising the disciplines we require to receive God – I've said that.
The main point. Everyone is IN Christ. When he acted, we were all acting in him. When he died, we were dying in him. At Incarnation, he assumed the whole of human nature, and the whole of MY life, and the whole of YOUR life, you see. This was to facilitate the Exchange of the Cross. He takes my life and gives me his in return. But in order for him to be able to give me his life, he has had to tailor his life to mine, so that it fits. He has had to adapt himself to the dimensions of a human life.
And there aren't any short cuts. He had to go through everything a human goes through in life. This is because we have to. If you are to get on a carousel, it has to be revolving slowly enough for you to be able to hop on. God's carousel of life revolves at the speed of light; our carousels go round at 2 mph.
In Jesus, God became human. Humanity is not a stative affair; it is not a state, it is a process. A human life is something that occurs in time. A piece of music requires performance in order to become real. Creation is a trinitarian affair, that is, it requires the action of all three Persons of the Trinity. Crucial to creation is the action of the Word, the 2nd Person of the Holy Trinity. The Word is the Representation of God. We are made in God's image and likeness, but we require time to enact this image and likeness, which consists primarily in that we relate to others in love. Life in time is the process through which Eternity is expressed in Creation. Shazam would be all very well in Eternity, but in Creation – and we are created beings – process is necessary. The answer to your question is contained in an account of the nature of creation, and of its relationship to Eternity.
ReplyDeleteYou see rescuing us from sin, and reconciling us back to him, was almost – I say almost – a by-product of what God was doing with Jesus. What he wanted to do was make Adam and Eve holy, to grace them, so that they and their descendants could become sons of God, able to live with God in eternity forever and enjoy him in the glory and power of his love. He wanted to take Adam's glory and turn it into divine glory, so that he, the Father, could have a big family to enjoy eternally, related to him not only in image and likeness, but also in nature. Remember that when God revealed himself to Moses, he described himself as “gracious”, in his very nature. God's nature doesn't change just because we messed up. No, God is gracious eternally. Sin was, in a way, merely the opportunity God needed to reveal his graciousness to people in a really powerful, effective way. In the Garden Satan scored a really bad own goal. Because he was presenting the Father with the perfect opportunity to reveal himself to men as gracious.
Gracious means that he does things freely. It is impossible for us to save ourselves. God has to do it for us. If a cup of tea has to be made, and you normally make it, but you can't today, so I volunteer to make it for you, I have to actually make the tea. In our world, tea is made by boiling water and steeping the tea. That's how we do it. Now God could perform a miracle, but the whole point of his becoming man was to enter into our world and do things for us, so that we, who are incapacitated, can benefit from his life. We cannot reach eternity. It is too big for us. Unless God humbles himself down to our level, we are stuck here. There is no tea, in our world, unless water is boiled and tea is steeped. Them's the rules. Like it or not, we have to endure time and space, in creation, in order to reach Glory. In fact this life isn't there just because God thought it would be nice for us to have a bit of life. No, this life is there to make us fit to inherit eternity. It is a training ground. Shazam would miss the point of why time and space exist at all. Time and space are necessary for us to go through in order to become fit to enjoy God's presence in eternity. We have to go through this life in order to grow and attain the stature of sonship, that is, to become sons of God. That's the actual nature of the necessity of creation. It's so that we, as created spirits, can have the opportunity to grow spiritually so as to be able to stand up before a holy Father as his sons, mature, able to live in eternity, with all that glory and wondrous beauty and amazingness of Eternity where God lives.
I did have another idea but it slipped away while I was congratulating myself on how clever I was. Actually if there is any revelation of truth in what I say, it is from the Holy Spirit, not from me.
Does this help, or must I go on?