It has been a busy week in the Holme Valley.
Fortunately, it seems that the hailstorms and the thunder and the rain have
finally left us for this winter (although I always say that, and find that I am
speaking too soon) and we’ve had a few days now of quiet, cool-ish weather,
interspersed every now and again with some quite pleasant sunshine, provided
you stayed out of the wind. We haven’t
entirely escaped “Aprille, with his shoures soote” that pierce “the droght of
Mersh” to “the roote”. It’s been cold at
night, though, and I have been keeping a wary eye out for frost, which could
damage the tender young herbs, even though they are in tubs.
This has pleased Matilda somewhat, and she seems to have
gained a bit of a new lease of life, with her numerous comings and goings out
on to the decking and back in again. It
is actually quite tedious letting her in and out all the time, but the
alternatives (either a cat flap in the double-glazed conservatory door at a
cost of approx £250, or opening up the existing cat flap again and feeling the
joy of the wind from the Urals whistling around your ankles) are even worse.
Misty, too, has been enjoying the longer evenings, because
now at least her meanderings over the featureless peat bogs and moorlands with
Debbie usually end in daylight, unless something goes massively wrong. Zak has been an occasional willing companion,
but Ellie now seems to recognise that, in the canine panoply, her role is to
keep the chair warm for the others when they get back.
We’ve seen the badger again, as well, and once more it was
at approximately 10.30pm, so we are obviously a fixture on Brenda’s nightly
route. It has been suggested that we should put out some peanut butter
sandwiches for her, because apparently badgers love peanut butter. I hasten to say we have not actually done
this, as I fear that the logical extension of such a move would be the badger
ambling into the conservatory one day, and asking for a table for one, and to
see today’s specials. Either that, or waking up with it snoring next to me on
the pillow. Much as I love badgers, there are limits.
The squirrels and the birds are also very active, as you
might expect – they’ve started doing that Alfred Hitchcock thing again where
they all line up on the branch outside my bedroom window and peer in,
encouraging me to get up and put the birdseed out on the decking.
Getting up has, however, been a bit of a problem of late.
Partly because once again I seem to be constantly in the grip of some sort of
low-grade lurgy, which seems always on the edge of flaring up into something
more serious, and keeps me awake at night and sends me to sleep during the day,
and partly because my wheelchair itself is not very well, and I suspect one of
the wheels may be on the way out, which makes sliding on and off it via the
banana board somewhat problematic, as it’s always more difficult to hit a
moving target. A service call is booked for the morrow.
Still, I haven’t fallen off my perch yet, and neither, it
would seem, has Her Majesty. There is obviously something in the “Gin and
Dubonnet” diet that promotes longevity, which is why her mother lasted to be
102 (degrees proof).
Predictably the media (the same media that hacked the
royals’ phones and drove Diana, literally, almost, to an early grave) went into
full-blown “Gawd Bless You, Ma’am” mode. I do, actually, have a lot of respect
for the Queen, more so than I do for some other members of her extended
family. As I said elsewhere this week, I
feel about the monarchy a lot like I feel about Trident and about the EU. Given a free hand and a blank sheet of paper,
personally, I would never in a million years have set off down a route that led
to here. The current state we’re in is the result of generations of meddlesome
idiot politicians, many of whom, have, sadly, gone to their graves unpunished.
But we are where we are, and we have comprehensively painted ourselves into a
corner whereby all the other options are even worse, so we might as well
persevere with what we’ve got and try and make a fist of it. Just don’t expect me to be happy about it,
that’s all.
As part of the Queen’s birthday celebrations, Obama has been
in town, taking this opportunity to put in his two penn’orth about the perils
of Brexit. He might as well have saved his breath to cool his kedgeree, since
the people voting to leave are mostly doing so because they don’t want brown
people coming to “their” country (which happens to be mine, too, but we’ll let
that go by outside the off stump for the moment) and depressing property
prices. So they are unlikely to listen to someone, er, brown, as demonstrated
by Boris Johnson, who chose to make Obama’s colour a feature of his rebuttal of
the President’s remarks.
Since this week has also contained St. George’s Day, the
massive sentiment-topped midweek blancmange that was the Queen’s birthday
tended to overflow into St George’s Day at the weekend as well, and the
internet was clogged up with people wanting to swear allegiance to Her Majesty
(von Hanover Saxe Coburg Gotha Battenburg) and St George (that well known
Turkish/Syrian/Palestinian itinerant dragon-slayer). It seemed pretty clear to me from what Obama
said that there wouldn’t be any free lunches across the pond for the UK if we vote
to leave, and this week the Treasury also published a report on the potentially
damaging economic consequences of Brexit. Ironically, however, because it was
promoted by George Osborne, the Chancer of the Exchequer, it was widely
rubbished, on the grounds that you can’t believe a word he says and he has
missed every target since 2010, when in fact this may have been the one
pronouncement he’s made that didn’t require flame-retardent undercrackers.
Cameron must have been quite glad of the distraction of the
Queen turning 90, as it momentarily diverted the focus of the news media away
from the vicious Tory in-fighting over Europe,
and the continuing deterioration of his government and all it stands for.
Jeremy Hunt seems determined to press on into the valley of death, the only
difference being that, unlike the government of 150 years ago, this time
around, Florence Nightingale will be on strike.
Nicky Morgan, allegedly the education secretary, apparently can’t spell
“sincerely”. And Channel 4’s continuing investigation into the 2015 election expenses
scandal is daily uncovering more and more evidence that, in fact, the
government consists of the finest politicians that money can buy.
For our foreign readers, a quick word of explanation might
be necessary here. There are strict limits on the amount of money that can be
spend by each side within a single constituency during an election. Each
candidate gets a free leaflet, free mailshots etc, and all other expenses are
subject to a maximum cap. What the Tories did was to fill a “battlebus” with
activists and drive them round from constituency to constituency. While they
were in the constituency, they worked to get the local candidate re-elected,
but the cost of the battlebus and the activists came out of a national budget
for national campaigning only. Opponents
claim that the Tories breached the local spending limits by subterfuge, and in
the nine most marginal seats, where the battlebus troops made a difference on
the ground, in effect they “bought” those constituencies. And I have to say, opponents have a point.
Meanwhile, in Liverpool, following on from my piece last
week about the government response to the official petition asking that
homeless ex-service personnel be housed in refurbished abandoned MOD bases, a
Labour (yes, Labour) councillor, Frank Hont, has rubbished the idea that the
city’s homeless could be housed in abandoned and empty buildings, after a 6,000
signature petition called for this. Writing in the Liverpool Echo, he called
the idea ill-informed, saying “If rough sleeping could be resolved simply by
housing people, we would do it tomorrow.” Well, go on, then. It seems to me
that one of the prime causes of homelessness is, er, not having a home. Or am I
missing something here? The model
suggested by the petitioners has worked successfully in the US, Canada,
Australia, France and Finland, by the way.
Things are not much better this side of the Pennines. In Leeds, the
local council is trying to stop Dion Smith, a local jeweller with a shop in the
city centre, who has been handing out cups of tea, biscuits, soup and snacks to
homeless people in the city, often accompanied by his bulldog, Lulu. He has
received the unwelcome attentions of Business Improvement District (presumably
some sort of local government quango) that employs people in bowler hats and
overcoats to wander round the city centre assisting visitors. I kid you not.
They are called, rather sinisterly, The Welcome People, although The Men In
Black seems more appropriate. Anyway, Mr Smith has had a visit from this crowd
of jokers:
Last week we were
approached by three people wearing bowler hats who said we should stop
providing food to the homeless as it was attracting intimidating and
undesirable people to the area.
Translation: we don’t want the yuppified centre of Leeds and
the yuppified people who shop there exposed to the harsh realities of life
under a council that would rather spend money on the Tour de bloody France than
sorting out the problem of town centre homelessness. I’ve said this before and I will say it
again. The problem of homelessness would be solved in a month if MPs and
Councillors were forced to sleep outside in a sleeping bag every night until
something was done about it. But because our politicians (of all parties) are,
by and large, with a few shining exceptions, lying, venal and corrupt two-faced
shits, the problem goes on.
If Labour had any sense (which clearly they don’t, see under
Frank Hont, above) they would make the food banks and the class war on the poor
and the disabled into a mantra for years to come. Every time some chinless
wonder starts going on about the free market, austerity and competitiveness,
they could blow them out of the water by just pointing out that it’s the way to
the food bank, in the same way as we’re constantly reminded by them that
apparently nationalisation or any form of state interventionism to save an
ailing steel industry, for instance, will immediately transport us back to 1979
and dead bodies lying unburied in the street. Yeah, right.
Anyway, today has been a rather sombre day, weather-wise at
least. While I have been typing this, the weather has turned dull and grey, and
the wind cold, once again. Today is the
feast of St Egbert, who is not to be confused with the later Egbert, Archbishop
of York, apparently. If only one of the two Egberts had been a swineherd, like
St Dunstan, we could then refer to the other one as “Egbert No Bacon”!
(Badum-tish! Here till Friday, try the veal).
Our Egbert, today’s Egbert, was an Anglo-Saxon nobleman,
probably from the Saxon kingdom
of Northumbria, who was
born some time in the 650s AD. In 664AD
he went to Ireland
to study, by which time he must have been in his mid-teens. His destination was either County Louth
or Connaught. It wasn’t entirely a
trouble-free journey, as his companion Ethelhun died of plague. Egbert also
caught it, but, surprisingly for those times, survived.
Egbert had vowed, while ill, that, if he was spared, he
would become a perpetual pilgrim and would lead a life of continuous prayer and
fasting. On his recovery, he began to
organise the monks in Ireland
to go to Frisia. He became known to, or friends with, all of the names which
are associated with the great era of Northumbrian saints – St Adalbert, St
Swithbert, St Chad,
St Willibrord, St Wigbert, and others.
Despite having influential contacts with the royal house of
Northumberland and of the Picts, he failed to stop King Ecgfrith of Northumbria from sending an expedition to Ireland
in 684AD.
He did, however, manage to persuade the Iona
community to adopt the Roman method of calculating Easter from 716AD onwards.
Ironically, the first day that his own monastery celebrated Easter according to
this new method was also the day Egbert died, on 24th April 729.
Apart from almost being a saint by association more than in
his own right, Egbert doesn’t seem to have been particularly saintly in any of
the normal aspects of sainthood, eg miracles and stuff like that. But, nevertheless, I guess he meant
well. He tried.
He holds, however, absolutely no lessons for me or for my
religious life. Not that anything much does, these days. Still, it’s been a
long week. And next week isn’t going to
be much better. Still, at least if Debbie’s back at work, it will bring a
temporary halt to her mission to make our house look like the IKEA catalogue.
And, in the meantime, apparently it’s been announced that my new nephew is
called Luke, which means I can at least revise my will.
I am, though, increasingly questioning myself these days,
especially in the matters of my spiritual life.
Believing that God is somehow connected to time, and that people who die
live on in another space we can’t access until we follow them, is all very
well, but where does Jesus fit into all this? Did Jesus really die for me, Steve
Rudd, 61 year old unwanted marketing director and largely unsuccessful
publisher, who is going to wizen away into a walnut over the next decade or so?
And if so, why? What the hell was he thinking?
Meanwhile, as I get less and less religious (or should that
be fewer?) I did spend what might be referred to as a reasonably enjoyable hour
this afternoon listening to choral evensong on BBC Radio 3. I may be turning
into one of those people who says they only go to church because they enjoy a
good sing.
I almost don’t want next week. I’m so very tired. And I have to deal with people who, to be
honest, don’t care if I spend £123.08 on their vanity projects with little
prospect of any return. But, on the plus
side, my petition, which
once had 198 signatures, now has 6,740, and a real chance of getting to 10,000
before August, and provoking a response from the government. It’s obviously
going to be a response that “the existing legislation is adequate” but even in
itself that can be challenged, it puts down a marker.
Perhaps my last act on this earth is going to be giving the
government a jab in the arse over animal welfare. Anyway, I could wish for
worse. The badger has been tonight, and eaten some more peanuts. If Jesus is
all he claims to be, there would be more, and better, badgers in the
world. Meanwhile, the jury is still out.
Here’s a little ditty for St George’s Day to keep you going.
A lovely post, Steve. In particular, I agree with what you say about the monarchy. We're lumbered with it and them so we might as well make the most of it.
ReplyDelete