It has been a busy
week in the Holme
Valley. I’d like to say
that preparations for our “Grand Depart” for the Isle of Arran are progressing
apace, but in truth I, personally, have done sod all towards it, and Deb, too,
has been busy elsewhere. So we really must get our act in gear next week. It’s
remained stubbornly hot and dull, with occasional showers. When it showers, it
really showers, as well.
When it stops
raining, the birds come out and patter about on the decking and on the roof of
the conservatory. Matilda finally noticed one doing precisely this one morning
during the week, and mirrored its movements exactly, stalking it from below. It
went over to one corner of the roof, she went over to the corresponding corner
of the conservatory floor. Eventually, though, the bird got fed up and flew
off, leaving Matilda looking rather disconsolate.
Muttkins has had a
succession of long or short walks, depending on the weather, sometimes in Zak’s
company, sometimes not. It seems unbelievable, but it will be a year on July 3rd
since we went up to Baildon Moor and picked her up from the farm and brought
her back here. July 3rd is also the fifth birthday of my little
niece Holly, so we’ve got a double cause for celebration.
Another cause for
celebration is, of course, the end of term. In one sense, it ought to be a
cause for concern, as well, since it marks the start of the lean months when
Debbie will not be earning any money until at least September. Plus I still
have to lever the remaining arrears out of Kirklees
College with a crowbar just to bring
us up to date [which is also exactly the sort of tedious admin that has stopped
me this week from getting on with preparing to go to Arran]. Set against this, though, at least Debbie can
shrug off the stress and hassle of another academic year, and relax for a
while. I think it’s starting to get to her: she came back from college one day
last week, the TV was on, softly, in the background, with a wide shot of Copacabana Beach and Adrian Chiles wittering on
aimlessly about Suarez snacking on Chelleni, with some fava beans and a good
chianti, and said:
Oh, are you watching
the cricket?
Yes, says I, it's the first test between Argentina
and Nigeria,
the wicket looks as if it might take spin on the final day, but I'm just
waiting while they send Geoffrey Boycott down there to stick his car key in the
surface, once the beach volleyball's finished. Sometimes, it’s not the size of
the disk, it's the speed of the processor that's the problem.
She’s also taken up cooking, insofar as pouring boiling water over
couscous can be defined as cooking. This has been necessitated by the
occurrence this week of several final classes marked with “bring and share”
food and drink sessions at the end. I’m
not sure what her colleagues think of couscous, but she managed to make the
kitchen table look like an explosion in a couscous factory. She has returned from these events laden with
carrier bags of cupcakes, crisps and chocolate biscuits, plus at least one
bunch of flowers and two or three thank you cards signed by her entire classes,
so she must have been doing something right.
For my own part, the week progressed better than I had hoped, in health
terms at least. The foul bugs that had infested me last week fled, their
departure hastened, no doubt, by the onset of the vitamin regime which
commenced at the behest of the Consultant at the last hospital visit, including
Ferrous Fumarate and Vitamin B12. Mind you, this could be just coincidence, but
either way, I was pleased to be feeling more like myself. I can admit now that
I was worried in case it was more than just a bug, but this time around, at
least, I seemed to have dodged a bullet.
The outside world, beyond the confines of our little enclave, is full of bullets to dodge, of course. Literal and metaphorical. Mostly in Syria and Iraq at the moment, but watch this space, in a week where President Obama committed armed drones to the theatre of war: the Pentagon said some of the drones and manned aircraft it was flying over Iraq were armed, but that they would be used to gather intelligence and ensure the safety of US personnel on the ground, rather than carrying out air strikes. And if you believe that, dear reader, how do you feel about the tooth fairy?
The outside world, beyond the confines of our little enclave, is full of bullets to dodge, of course. Literal and metaphorical. Mostly in Syria and Iraq at the moment, but watch this space, in a week where President Obama committed armed drones to the theatre of war: the Pentagon said some of the drones and manned aircraft it was flying over Iraq were armed, but that they would be used to gather intelligence and ensure the safety of US personnel on the ground, rather than carrying out air strikes. And if you believe that, dear reader, how do you feel about the tooth fairy?
Here at home, the BBC has continued to ignore
the voice of legitimate protest against “austerity” and the cuts. As I sit here
typing this, they have already had 6000 complaints about the lack of coverage
of last Saturday’s central London demonstration, and they compounded this yesterday
by ignoring the protest in Westminster by members of Dpac, a group set up
specifically to oppose the effects of the cuts on disabled people.
Since we can’t rely on the BBC to report things truthfully
and accurately any more, we have to piece together the story from a number of
other sources. Demonstrators set up a camp in the grounds of Westminster Abbey
to protest against cuts to financial support for disabled people.
Members of disabled people against the cuts (Dpac) pitched
tents and said they intended to occupy the green outside the doors of the Abbey
until 22 July. The Dean of Westminster was
asked to negotiate with the protesters on Saturday evening, after they claimed
he initially refused their request for permission to stay. The group also sent a letter to the
Archbishop of Canterbury, urging the church not to forcibly remove them from
its grounds. Around 100 protesters began the demonstration, but a heavy police
presence meant their number dwindled to around 50. There were scuffles and confrontations
and apparently several onlookers and tourists were surprised by the amount of
overkill the police were using compared to the actual threat, of two or three
dozen disabled people locking themselves to the railings in Parliament Square.
The Metropolitan police said that one person was arrested
on suspicion of assaulting a police officer as protesters sought to establish a
camp and officers resolved to stop them. Police stood on top of tents in a bid
to prevent the demonstrators from pitching them. It’s amazing how they can always find extra
police when a Chinese despot wants to run the Olympic Torch through the streets
of London, or
there's a miners' strike to break, or there's a demo to kettle, or they panic
because some people in wheelchairs might chain themselves to the railings.
Where were this lot when the foxes were being torn to pieces in defiance of the
hunting ban? Or come to that, where were they when my car radio was being
nicked?
I’ll be interested to see how this one turns out, but I am not
holding my breath that the Church of England will do the right thing. Yes, Westminster Abbey is a national treasure
and yes, there has to be some sort of right to private property and access, but
there is also a right to legitimate peaceful protest, or there damn well should
be. The policing seems as deliberately designed to sweep disabled people into
the background as the policy which Dpac was protesting against: the loss of the
Independent Living Payment, which will mean more disabled people being
prevented from leading relatively independent lives, and consigned to care
homes and the like, instead, because it’s cheaper.
In olden times, one could have relied upon several dozen Labour
MPs to show their solidarity with such a protest, but these days, it is Labour
policy on benefits to be more Tory than the Tories, for fear of upsetting Daily
Mail and Sun readers, and only John McDonnell MP had the courage to turn out
and support the protesters. Ed Miliband, the Labour leader at the moment, was busy writing
one of a series of what are beginning to look like increasingly desperate pleas
to get me to donate £3.00 to the Labour Party for the chance to meet him in
person at Doreen Lawrence’s gala bloody dinner at the House of Lords on July 9th.
Readers of previous blogs will recall that
somehow I have managed to get myself on the email list of “One Nation Labour”
and as a result I receive regular updates from the Labour Party, jollying me
along and urging me to donate to the cause. I always reply to these emails, and my replies are either
wearily instructive, angry, or abusive, and occasionally all three. Clearly
no-one ever reads these replies, or I would have been crossed off the list long
ago. It just goes to show that at the heart of the current Labour Party there
is a self-selecting, self-serving clique around Ed Miliband, and they are all
sharing the delusion that if they put their hands over their ears and say “la
la la la I can’t hear you”, this will be enough to win the next election. It
won’t, and we will all suffer another five years of The Blight Brigade’s
nuclear winter as a result. Which will be a tragedy. Meanwhile, I am going to reply to this email by asking Ed
Miliband how much I would have to donate to guarantee that I would have no chance of my ever meeting either him, or Doreen Lawrence.
And so
we came to Sunday, and the feast of Saints Peter and Paul. This rather
“engineered” joint celebration is regarded by the Catholic church as a
“solemnity”, having been previously designated as a Double, a Greater Double,
or a First-Class Feast. It is also a Holy day of Obligation. I suppose we should expect no less of the two people who,
between them, did so much to take the simple message of Jesus, codify it,
complicate it, graft on some sort of compulsory morality, and turn it into a
worldwide movement with power, splendour, wealth and influence. Thence comes
orthodox doctrine and, inevitably, heresy. All of which sounds like I am disapproving of the process. Which I am, sort, of. The story of St Peter
and St Paul is
so well known that I won’t even begin to insult your intelligence by
summarising them.
Without them, of course, Jesus would have gone down in
history as just another Essene, a Gnostic raving in the wilderness. By the way,
when I say I am ambivalent about the way in which Paul and Peter shaped the
church, it is in no way intended to be a specific comment or attack on the
Catholic church: the process can be seen over and over again, and not only in
churches. You take a zealous, young, idealistic group of people, the Oxford
Famine Committee, and you end up with Oxfam, a charity operating all over the
world with a global HQ in Oxford with an atrium and clocks showing the time in
every time-zone on Earth.
The argument is often advanced in favour of large-scale
organisation, be it of churches or charities, that they can achieve so much
more by scaling up, by acting like a business, than if they remained a
ramshackle ad hoc committee with trestle tables and a collecting tin. The
danger is of course, that they (the church, or the charity) become too
concerned with self-perpetuation and forget what they were trying to achieve.
One wonders how many people would continue to donate to Oxfam if they read Paul
Theroux’s coruscating comments about aid workers and their negative effect on Africa, in Dark
Star Safari.
Personally, I try and concentrate my charitable efforts, such
as they are these days, into smaller charities where I know that my weedy
widow’s mite will not be swallowed up in paying someone to polish the clocks in
the atrium, but has at least a fighting chance of getting to the people or
causes that the charity is trying to help or achieve. In the same way as these
days my church is not some lavish baroque cathedral with censers swinging and
monks chanting plainsong, attractive though those can be in certain
circumstances, but often a clump of trees, the front seat of the camper van, or
the windswept wilds of Walney, with the plainsong provided by a passing seagull:
When one’s friends hate each other
how can there be peace in the world?
Their asperities diverted me in my green
time.
A blown husk that is finished
but the light sings eternal
a pale flare over marshes
where the salt hay whispers to tide’s change
As Ezra Pound put it, much better than I can. I’m not saying all charities are like this, or all churches, and I’m not saying that those which are the most
self-perpetuating, are like that all the time. It does sometimes feel though,
that Oxfam doesn’t actually want to abolish hunger and world poverty, because
what would they do then? Apart from sign on. Likewise, the church occasionally
seems so preoccupied with its own worldly wealth, pomp and power, that they
have forgotten that Jesus, if he was around today, would be with the people
dossing down under the railway arches, or rifling through skips: outside, with
the protestors in the tents.
True, Oxfam and their ilk have done good works. Criticising the
Junta for causing poverty in the UK and getting under their skin,
for one thing. And the churches have done immense good in spreading healthcare
and education in the developing world. So it’s not all bad. I guess what I am
saying, what I am arguing for, is a re-balancing, a re-assessment on behalf of
organised religion, concentrating on the core message, and following that to
its logical conclusion, however painful the conclusion you come to.
Why is this important? Because now, the church of England has
to respond to the challenge laid down by the Dpac protestors, and either stand with
them, or stand by and let them be removed by the police. Given the outcome of
the previous “Occupy” protest at St Pauls, I am not hopeful, though I would be
glad to be pleasantly surprised.
I’ve often said, to an audience of minus one, unless you count
the cat or the dog, that what the country needs is a massive spiritual
awakening, something to shake the foundations of the banks and the city, to
re-focus people on things that really matter. Maybe that process has to start
with the church, or churches gong through that process. Not gay marriage, not
women bishops, not coffee mornings or flower rotas, not genteel collections of
raffia items for recycling for Africa.
What we need is some sort of temporary rapture. Stop in
mid-sermon, walk away from your plough in mid-furrow, get up from your desk,
and if you can physically make it, go to Westminster
and occupy the Abbey. And stay there until this cruel law is reversed, and all
the other cruel and unchristian laws enacted since 2010. And stay there until there
is an end to homelessness and a commitment to build new homes for all that need
them.
I’ve been taken to task before for being self-referential and
quoting from my own stuff, but I wrote this ten years ago in Here Endeth The Epilogue and it’s still true
today:
Just for a fleeting moment I had a vision of
a new church. A new church for a new era, where all the leaves recognised they
were leaves like all the other leaves, and that they had all sprung from the
same root. Imagine a church with the intellectual rigour and the anthems and
the cathedrals of Anglicanism, the pomp and majesty and symbolism of the
Catholics, the contemplative and peaceful life of the Quakers, the reforming
zeal of the Methodists, assembling hand-loom weavers on the windy moorlands of
Northern England to sing ragged hymns and tell them there can be a better world
in this life AND the next; the innovation of the people who are willing to
believe in things like spiritual healing - and who is to say they are wrong, it
could just be science that we don’t understand yet. Imagine if we all rose up
together one day and went to one place and let out a resounding shout that war
shall cease and poverty shall cease and everybody shall have enough food and
water.
Well, as Father Ted would doubtless say if he were here right
now, that would be an ecumenical matter. It’s good to dream though, once in a
while. If you don’t have a dream, how you gonna have a dream come true? You may
say I’m a dreamer, but I’m not the only one. Tread softly, for you tread on my
dreams. I'll let you be in my dreams, if I can be in yours.
Meanwhile, back here in the wide-awake world, or what passes
for it these days, I’m going to earth up some spuds, I think, provided it
doesn’t rain, and then see if I can knock some tasks off tomorrow’s list,
today. But before any of that, I’m going to put the kettle on, because dreaming
is thirsty work.